Canada did not have an official national flag until 1965. The country was ninety-eight years old. The Red Ensign, a British colonial flag with the Union Jack in the corner and Canada’s coat of arms, flew over government buildings by tradition rather than by law. Nobody had ever formally adopted it. Nobody had been willing to have the fight that formal adoption would require.
Lester Pearson decided he would have the fight. He was wrong about how hard it would be and right that it needed to happen.
Why It Had Not Been Done
The flag question was a proxy for a larger argument about what Canada was and who it belonged to. For English Canadians with deep ties to Britain, particularly veterans who had served under the Red Ensign in two world wars, any change to the flag was a betrayal of the men buried under it. This was a genuine emotional position, not a political calculation. These were people who had watched friends die and who associated the flag flying over them at the time with the sacrifice those deaths represented. Asking them to accept a new flag was asking them to accept that the symbol under which those men had fought was optional.
For French Canadians, a flag with the Union Jack in the corner was a symbol of someone else’s heritage. Quebec had no particular attachment to the British imperial tradition and several hundred years of reasons to be ambivalent about it.
Previous prime ministers had looked at this divide and decided the math did not work. No flag would satisfy both communities. Better to leave it unresolved. Pearson, who had built a career on resolving things that other people thought were unresolvable, disagreed.
The Legion Hall in Winnipeg
In May 1964, Pearson unveiled his preferred design to a Canadian Legion convention in Winnipeg. Three red maple leaves on a white background, flanked by blue bars. The room booed him. Veterans who had fought under the Red Ensign stood up and heckled the Prime Minister of Canada in person. Pearson stood there and took it and did not change his position. Whatever else you want to say about the man, that took something.
John Diefenbaker was watching and drawing conclusions. The Opposition leader, a fierce defender of Canada’s British heritage and a genuinely passionate speaker, launched a parliamentary campaign against any flag change that became legendary for its intensity and duration. Diefenbaker used every procedural tool available to extend and complicate the debate. He gave speeches of considerable emotional power about men who had died under the current flag. He was genuinely moved by what he was arguing, which made him more effective and more difficult to dismiss.
The debate lasted 33 sitting days and consumed over 250 hours of parliamentary time. At several points it appeared to be destroying the government entirely.
The debate ran from June to December 1964, thirty-three sitting days and more than two hundred and fifty hours of parliamentary time. It was, by any measure, one of the most exhausting episodes in Canadian legislative history. MPs argued about history, about identity, about the meaning of symbols, about what kind of country Canada was trying to be. Some of it was important. Much of it was repetitive. All of it was necessary in the sense that the country needed to have the argument before it could move past it.
George Stanley’s Design
Pearson’s government eventually referred the question to a fifteen-member committee with all-party representation. The committee received over two thousand design submissions. Beavers. Loons. Crosses. Combinations of maple leaves and Union Jacks that tried to please everyone and succeeded only in looking confused. The committee spent six weeks working through the options.
The design that won had been submitted by George Stanley, a historian at the Royal Military College, and refined by graphic designer Jacques Saint-Cyr. A single stylized maple leaf, eleven points, on white, flanked by red bars. Clean. Unambiguous. Belonging to no particular heritage. The blue bars from Pearson’s original proposal were dropped. Red and white were Canada’s official colours. The leaf was the leaf.
The committee voted fourteen to one for it. Pearson used closure to force a final parliamentary vote, which infuriated Diefenbaker and was probably necessary. The flag was approved on December 15, 1964. It became official on February 15, 1965.
Diefenbaker Refused to Attend
He voted against it until the end and did not go to the flag-raising ceremony on Parliament Hill. Some veterans stayed home too, or flew the Red Ensign alongside the new flag in quiet protest. The transition was not unanimous and not without genuine pain for people who had meaningful reasons to mourn what was changing.
But the flag worked. Within a generation it had become one of the most recognized national symbols in the world, partly because Canadian backpackers began sewing it to their bags as a way of not being mistaken for Americans, and that habit spread and became something larger. The maple leaf became the shorthand for Canada in places where Canada had no other shorthand. Pearson’s gamble produced exactly the symbol he had hoped for, a flag that belonged to all Canadians rather than one heritage.
Sixty years later it is almost impossible to imagine anything else on the Peace Tower. That is the nature of successful symbols. They become inevitable only after the fact. Before the fact, they require someone willing to get booed in a Legion hall in Winnipeg and keep going anyway.
The Committee and the Winning Design
Faced with parliamentary paralysis, Pearson’s government referred the flag question to a 15-member committee with representation from all parties. The committee received over 2,000 design submissions from the public — including designs featuring beavers, loons, crossed hockey sticks, and combinations of maple leaves and Union Jacks that tried to satisfy everyone and satisfied no one.
The design that ultimately won was created by George Stanley, a historian at the Royal Military College of Canada, and refined by graphic designer Jacques Saint-Cyr. It was based loosely on the flag of the Royal Military College itself: a single stylized 11-point maple leaf on white, flanked by red bars. The choice of red and white came from Canada’s national colours. The blue bars from Pearson’s original proposal were dropped.
The committee voted 14 to 1 in favour of the single-maple-leaf design. When it came back to Parliament, Pearson used closure to force a vote — a procedural maneuver that ended the debate and infuriated the Opposition. The new flag was approved on December 15, 1964, and officially became Canada’s national flag on February 15, 1965 — a date now observed as National Flag of Canada Day.
The Aftermath
Diefenbaker voted against the new flag to the end and refused to attend the official flag-raising ceremony on Parliament Hill. Many veterans were genuinely heartbroken. The transition was not seamless or universally celebrated.
But the flag worked. Within a generation, it had become one of the most recognized national symbols in the world — partly because Canadians began sewing it onto backpacks and jackets when travelling abroad, a habit that started as a way of distinguishing themselves from Americans and became a quiet expression of national pride. The maple leaf, which Pearson chose specifically because it was a symbol shared across Canada’s French and English communities, achieved exactly what he had hoped: it became everyone’s flag.
Sixty years later, it’s almost impossible to imagine anything else flying over the Peace Tower. That’s the nature of successful symbols — once they work, they feel inevitable. They never were.
Canadian Archive 
Leave a comment